Love it or hate it, the Reboot Robot controlling Hollywood from a secret underground lair has shown no signs of weakness.

Just yesterday, reboots of two fan-favorite (if somewhat on the fringe) movies from the 1990s were announced: “Stargate,” the portal-warping science fiction thriller that spawned numerous television follow-ups, and “Cliffhanger,” the Sylvester Stallone mountain-scaling action flick that brought you this little slice of horror:

Between those obscure reboot ideas, not to mention the fact that there’s a “Point Break” redo on the way, it’s starting to seem like all of our favorite ’90s movies are about to get the reboot treatment. What’s next?

“The Rock”

Starring Zac Efron in the Nicolas Cage role and Nicolas Cage in the Sean Connery role.

“Face/Off”

Because those faces can’t stay on forever.

“Broken Arrow”

Ain’t it cool?

“True Romance”

This is what Quentin Tarantino is doing instead of “The Hateful Eight.”

“The Professional”

Evvvvveeeeeerrrrrrryyyyyyyy reboot.

“The Fifth Element”

Re-boot multi-pass.

“The Sixth Sense”

Except this time, they were all dead the whole time.

“Forrest Gump”

Stupid reboot is as stupid reboot does.

“A League of their Own”

Okay, this sounds eerily plausible. Hollywood, stay the heck away from the Rockford Peaches.

“The Sandlot”

Now I’m just depressed.

Following “Cliffhanger” and “Stargate,” which ’90s movies do you expect to see rebooted next?

Josh Wigler

Warning: “Breaking Bad” spoilers ahead.

It’s over when he says it’s over — and he’s not saying that just yet.

Bryan Cranston, multiple Emmy-award winning star of the multiple Emmy-award winning “Breaking Bad,” has seemingly put Walter White behind him, following the show’s conclusion last fall. And based on that ending, it doesn’t seem particularly likely that Cranston could bring his Heisenberg hellfire and brimstone back to life anytime soon.

But is Walter White actually dead? In an interview with CNN’s Ashleigh Banfield, Cranston gave a seriously cagey response that have some fans wondering if the legendary Heisenberg is truly dead and gone.

“Hey, you never saw bags zip up or anything,” said Cranston. “Or anybody say… you know.”

Indeed, the show never flat-out confirms that Walter dies from his accidentally self-inflicted gunshot wound. He falls to the ground and stares up at the ceiling, seemingly lifeless, but that’s the final image of the show, without further elaboration.

In the “Breaking Bad” finale script, however, writer and creator Vince Gilligan makes it a bit more explicit, describing Walter as “lifeless” in the final shot, with “faint satisfaction” as “his final expression.”

“He got away,” the script reads.

If you take the script as canon, then Walter is definitively dead. But if we’re going solely by what’s on screen, perhaps there’s an out — or perhaps it’s just wishful thinking on everyone’s part.

“Never say never,” Cranston told CNN.

But even if Walt is in that mobile meth factory in the sky, that doesn’t mean we won’t see the character again some day. ...

With Edgar Wright gone, should Marvel bother with “Ant-Man” anymore?

Sure, it has Paul Rudd and Michael Douglas and a lot of other great actors. Yes, that sizzle reel showing off Ant-Man’s size-changing shenanigans was pretty fantastic. But without Wright’s signature magic in the mix, does anyone actually want to see a movie about the bug-sized hero — especially when there are so many other heroes worth exploring on film?

With “Ant-Man,” Marvel faces many obstacles, including finding a replacement for Wright and other key creatives, while still meeting its July 2015 release date. It’s not an impossible goal to achieve, but it’s a difficult one — and perhaps an unnecessary one. Perhaps the better alternative is to stop down on “Ant-Man” altogether and refocus on some of the other heroes in the Marvel catalogue that bring more to the table.

Here are nine movies that make more sense for Marvel right now than “Ant-Man.”

“Doctor Strange”
The Sorcerer Supreme was name-checked in “Captain America: The Winter Soldier.” Casting and director rumors have swirled around for years. It’s time to pull the trigger, Marvel. Make the Master of the Mystic Arts a priority.

“Captain Marvel”
Carol Danvers, the world is waiting for you. Marvel Studios has broken the superhero movie mold in so many ways over the years. They need to come out of the gate with the first female-led superhero movie, and there is no candidate better than the hero who wears Marvel in ...

He’s the best there is at what he does — but he wasn’t always the best.

Hugh Jackman, international superstar thanks to his role as Wolverine across seven different “X-Men” movies, wasn’t always so comfortable brandishing those adamantium claws. The Australian actor was a latecomer to 2000′s “X-Men,” joining the cast at the last minute after Dougray Scott dropped out of the film.

At the time, nobody knew anything about Jackman; he was a complete unknown to the mainstream moviegoing masses. How was he able to dig his claws into one of the most iconic comic book roles of all time?

Well, thanks to an audition video unearthed by ComicBookMovie.com, we have an answer. Watch the 11-minute video below to check out Jackman’s initial audition to play the fast-healing mutant:

The video features Jackman, no more than 30 years old at the time, reading Wolverine’s lines with the actor’s own Australian accent — an accent he eventually abandoned when he won the role. Interestingly enough, Jackman was not the first Australian Wolverine.

What do you think of Jackman’s Wolverine audition?

Josh Wigler

What is dead may never die.

Those words are typically found on a different high-profile show, but they’re applicable when it comes to “Community,” based on recent news. Weeks after NBC canceled the Dan Harmon sitcom, it now appears that Hulu is attempting to bring the series back to life for another season.

The Hollywood Reporter confirms talks between Hulu and Sony Pictures Television for the resurrection of “Community,” though there’s no deal on the table yet. Shortly after NBC canceled the series after five seasons, Sony Pictures Television’s Jamie Erlicht said that he would fight for the show’s return.

“You can’t get to six seasons and a movie without six seasons,” said Erlicht. “This show had a remarkable history. There are real conversations we need to have with everyone as soon as we get back. We’ve been on the receiving end of some phone calls, but we really need to get together with the ‘Community’ team and have real conversations and figure out the future. If there’s any show that should have a future or could have a future, it really feels like ‘Community’ is the one.”

But Dan Harmon, creator of “Community” and show runner for four out of five seasons (the less said about season four, the better), was less optimistic about bringing the show back. In a blog post written two weeks ago, Harmon said he was “definitely in the ‘eh’ column” about the possibility of “Community” making a comeback.

“For a million reasons, some ...

Dreams do come true, even for misguided billionaires like John Hammond.

Colin Trevorrow, director of the upcoming “Jurassic World,” has confirmed recent rumors about the plot and details of the next film in the “Jurassic” series. His interview with Slash Film, posted late last night, pulled the curtain back on how dinosaurs are back in the mix following the events of the first three “Jurassic Park” movies, what Chris Pratt’s character is all about, and much more.

Read on if you want the details, but be warned: spoilers are ahead.

1. “Jurassic World” is the “Disney World” of Dinosaurs
Twenty-two years after the events of “Jurassic Park,” John Hammond’s dreams for a dinosaur-filled amusement park have been realized. According to Trevorrow, the titular Jurassic World is “a fully functional park on Isla Nublar” that sees 20,000 visitors every day, arriving by ferry from Costa Rica.

Jurassic World has all of the characteristics of great theme parks: Luxury resorts with hotels, restaurants, golf courses and more. The only difference between this park and others is that at Jurassic World, there are dinosaurs — lots of them.

“You can get closer to them than you ever imagined possible,” according to Trevorrow.

2. Dino Disillusionment
For Trevorrow and his creative team, one of the key ideas behind “Jurassic World” is the “seen it, over it” nature of culture today. In a world where high-speed Internet access can show you everything you want to know in the blink of an eye, where the ...

Warning: Spoilers for “X-Men: Days Of Future Past” are ahead.

Well, that’s one way to push the reset button.

By the end of “X-Men: Days of Future Past,” director Bryan Singer’s mash-up of two different eras of mutant mayhem, the table has been reset for Fox’s “X-Men” franchise. All that came before in the first three “X-Men” movies has, arguably, become undone. The way is clear for the “First Class” cast to move forward, continuity-free — something that fans have wanted to see for years.

So, what’s next? In two years, we’ll have “X-Men: Apocalypse,” featuring the nearly immortal villain that was seen building pyramids with his mind at the end of “Days of Future Past.” That’s one character you can count on seeing in the next “X-Men” movie. You can also bank on returns for James McAvoy as Xavier, Michael Fassbender as Magneto, Nicholas Hoult as Beast and Jennifer Lawrence as Mystique, the keepers of the “First Class” flame. And Quicksilver? All but guaranteed, based on the popularity of his big scene.

Who else needs to be involved? Here are a few of the mutants we want to see in “X-Men: Apocalypse.”

Cyclops
One of the greatest achievements of “Days of Future Past” is the resurrection of Scott Summers. When James Marsden appeared on screen, it yielded more applause than any other moment from the film. Now that Cyclops is back, and on Xavier’s radar (thanks to Logan), it’s time for the Fox films to treat the character with the love and respect ...