All blockbusters these days arrive in theaters with an avalanche of a backstory, but the one for is richer than most. During production, the film's budget ballooned to (reportedly) more than $200 million; it endured massive reshoots and was eventually stitched together to combine the visions of no fewer than four writers. But the important question is, is the film worth watching, or is it destined to be known more by its troubled history than its future at the box office?
Critics thus far have been divided about the film's merits, with some calling it engaging and sharp and others dismissing it as slick and superficial. MTV News assembled a roundup of some of the reactions critics have published on the Web so fans have something in mind when they decide which movies to see in theaters this weekend.
How Does "World War Z" Compare To Other Recent Disaster/ Outbreak Movies?
"At its best, 'World War Z' treads in territory much like Steven Soderbergh's 'Contagion' but when it covers territory that's already been well covered in films like Danny Boyle's '28 Days Later' it feels somewhat redundant."
— Ed Douglas, Comingsoon.net
How Scary Are Those Zombies?
"There are palpable moments of terror, but once we've seen the flesh-eating hordes up close, it's hard not to laugh at their goggly eyes, incessant jerking and hideous gnashing teeth."
— Claudia Puig, USA Today
How Likely Are Those Brain-Eating Monsters To Make Me Gag?
"The dangers maintain a relatively innocuous feel, partly because the movie's so aggressively PG-13: There's little in the way ...